What Are Imaginary Numbers and Why Do They Exist?

There's no real number that squares to -1. Instead of giving up, mathematicians built a whole new plane where the answer turns out to be a rotation. Here's how i actually works, and why it's not as imaginary as the name suggests.

By Petrus Sheya

July 21, 2026 · 5 min read

What number, multiplied by itself, gives you 1-1?

Try it. Pick any number you like: positive, negative, a fraction, doesn't matter. Square it and you get something that's zero or positive. Never negative. So the equation x2=1x^2 = -1 has no answer.

...and yet every scientific calculator has a button for it. Electrical engineers use it every day. It shows up in quantum mechanics, in signal processing, even in the way your phone's GPS chip handles timing. So what is this thing that "doesn't exist," and why does it matter so much?

Why can't the number line hold the answer?

Here's the thing about squaring a real number: it erases the sign. 32=93^2 = 9. (3)2=9(-3)^2 = 9. Same result either way. Squaring only ever moves you to zero or the positive side of the number line, never to the negative side.

Drag the point below and watch x2x^2 chase after 1-1. It gets close. It never arrives.

Drag the real number x. Watch x² chase after −1 and never arrive, no matter which real number you try.

-4-3-2-10123456789target: −1x
1.96
Distance from −12.96
x² = −1 ?never

No matter where you put xx, the closest x2x^2 ever gets to 1-1 is 11, and that only happens at x=0x = 0. The real number line, the one you learned in school, simply has no room for a solution. The gap is real. The number line just isn't big enough to close it.

So mathematicians just... invented one?

Basically, yes. Back in the 1500s, while solving cubic equations, mathematicians kept running into 1\sqrt{-1} as a stepping stone in the middle of their work. They noticed something strange: even though this "number" didn't exist, if you carried it through the algebra and let it cancel out at the end, you got correct, real answers.

That was suspicious enough to take seriously. So they gave it a name, ii, short for imaginary, defined by one rule:

i2=1i^2 = -1

But calling ii a "number" is where people get stuck. A number is supposed to measure something: a length, a count, a debt. What does ii measure? Nothing, if you're thinking of numbers as points on a line. But ii isn't hiding further down that line somewhere. It's not a quantity. It's an instruction.

What if i isn't a number, but a move?

Think about what multiplying by 1-1 actually does to a number. It doesn't scale it, it flips it, spinning it 180° around zero. 33 becomes 3-3. 3-3 becomes 33. Same distance from the origin, opposite direction.

Now here's the question that unlocks everything: what single rotation, applied twice, produces that same 180° flip?

Drag the slider until the bold arrow lands exactly on 1-1.

Multiplying by −1 spins a vector 180°. Drag the slider to find the single rotation that, applied twice, does exactly that.

1−1
Applied once40°
Applied twice80°
Matches −1?not yet

There's only one answer: a 90° turn. Turn 90° once, and you're not at 1-1 yet. Turn another 90°, and now you've gone the full 180°, landing exactly on 1-1. ii is what you get from a single 90° rotation. That's the whole idea. i2=1i^2 = -1 isn't some algebraic coincidence, it's just a description of what happens when you rotate twice.

So where do these numbers live?

If ii is a rotation and not a point on the real line, it needs somewhere else to point to. That somewhere is a second axis, perpendicular to the real one. We call it the imaginary axis, and together the two axes make up the complex plane.

Every complex number gets written as z=a+biz = a + bi, where aa is how far along the real axis you go, and bb is how far along the imaginary axis. It's just a coordinate, exactly like (a,b)(a, b) on a normal graph, except we write it with a ++ and an ii glued in the middle.

Drag the point around and watch its coordinates update.

Drag the point anywhere. Every complex number is just a location on this plane, with a real coordinate and an imaginary one.

realimaginary2.6 + 1.8i
Real part2.60
Imaginary part1.80
Magnitude |z|3.16
Angle35°

Notice there are two equally valid ways to describe the same point: by its coordinates (aa and bb), or by its distance from the origin together with the angle it makes with the real axis. We write the distance as z=a2+b2|z| = \sqrt{a^2+b^2}, called the magnitude, and the angle as arg(z)\arg(z). Same point, two languages. The angle language is about to matter a lot.

What happens when we multiply two of these?

...and here's the payoff. Remember, ii is a rotation. So what should multiplying two complex numbers do? If each one carries a rotation and a length, multiplying them should combine both: rotations add, lengths multiply.

One vector below spins and pulses on its own. Drag the slider to rotate the other one, and watch what the product does.

One vector spins and pulses on its own. Drag the slider to rotate the other one, and watch what the product does.

z1z2z1·z2
Angles add35° + 0° = 35°
Lengths multiply1.30 × 0.55 = 0.72

That's the entire rule for multiplying complex numbers: add the angles, multiply the lengths. No memorizing i2=1i^2 = -1 mid-calculation, just two spinning arrows combining into a third. This is exactly why complex numbers show up everywhere rotation and waves matter, electrical circuits, sound, quantum states: multiplying by a complex number is a rotate-and-scale machine, built right into arithmetic.

So, why do imaginary numbers exist?

They exist because the real number line only has one direction to move in, and squaring can't produce a negative number by moving along it. Once we allow a second direction, a 90° turn away from the real line, the missing square root appears naturally. It's just what a right-angle rotation looks like, written as arithmetic.

ii was never "imaginary" in the sense of being fake. It's a coordinate on a second axis, and multiplying by it is as real an operation as flipping a switch. The name just stuck from a time before anyone understood what it actually was.