What Is a Conic Section? Circles, Ellipses, Parabolas, and Hyperbolas

Four shapes that look nothing alike turn out to be the same shape, seen from different angles. Slice a cone and watch a circle turn into an ellipse, then a parabola, then a hyperbola.

By Petrus Sheya

July 19, 2026 · 6 min read

Why do a circle, an ellipse, a parabola, and a hyperbola all get filed under the same word, "conic section"? They don't look related. A circle is closed and round. A hyperbola is two curves that fly off to infinity. What could they possibly have in common?

Here's the answer in one sentence: they're all the same shadow, cast by the same cone, just tilted at different angles.

That's not a metaphor. It's literally how the name "conic section" got its name. Let's see it.


One cone, four shadows

Picture an ice cream cone, but doubled, two cones joined tip to tip, stretching up and down forever. Now imagine slicing straight through it with a flat plane, like a knife through a stick of butter.

Slice it perfectly level, perpendicular to the cone's axis, and the cut edge is a circle.

Tilt the knife a little. The circle stretches into an oval, an ellipse.

Keep tilting. At some exact angle, the cut becomes parallel to the slanted side of the cone itself, and the curve stops closing on itself. It opens up forever. That's a parabola.

Tilt past that point, and the plane is now steep enough to cut through both nappes of the double cone. You get two separate curves, a hyperbola.

Drag the angle of the slicing plane through the double cone. Watch the cross-section it leaves behind.

CROSS-SECTION
ShapeCircle
Eccentricity e0.00

Drag the angle. Watch the cross-section on the right morph through all four shapes without ever changing the cone itself, only the angle of the cut. Same object, four different shadows. That's the whole idea behind the name.


But a knife and a cone aren't math. What's the actual definition?

Slicing cones is a great way to see where these curves come from, but it's clumsy to work with. Nobody wants to do algebra with a 3D cone every time they need an ellipse.

So mathematicians found a flat, 2D definition that produces the exact same four curves, using nothing but a point and a line.

Here's the idea: pick a fixed point, call it the focus. Pick a fixed line that doesn't pass through it, call it the directrix. Now collect every point PP in the plane whose distance to the focus, divided by its distance to the directrix, equals some fixed number.

We call that number the eccentricity, and we write it as ee:

e=PFPDe = \frac{PF}{PD}

Change ee, and you sweep through all four conic types, continuously, on a single dial:

  • e=0e = 0: a circle
  • 0<e<10 < e < 1: an ellipse
  • e=1e = 1: a parabola
  • e>1e > 1: a hyperbola

Watch the ratio hold, everywhere on the curve

Here's the part that should feel almost suspicious the first time you see it: that ratio, PF/PDPF / PD, doesn't just equal ee at one special point. It equals ee at every single point on the curve. That's what actually generates the shape, point after point, all satisfying the same ratio.

Slide e, then drag the point P around the curve. The ratio of its distance to the focus over its distance to the directrix never changes.

directrixF
ShapeEllipse
PF71.2
PD114.6
PF / PD0.622

Slide ee to reshape the curve. Then drag the point PP anywhere along it, top, bottom, far side, doesn't matter. The blue line is PFPF, the distance to the focus. The rose line is PDPD, the distance to the directrix. Their ratio always comes back to the exact value of ee you set.

That's not a coincidence, it's the definition doing its job. Every point that satisfies PF/PD=ePF/PD = e belongs to the curve, and every point on the curve satisfies it. Notice, too, how the curve itself changes character as ee crosses 1, closed and blue below it, open and gold right at it, splitting apart into rose beyond it.


The ellipse's other secret: two foci, one constant sum

The focus-directrix definition works for all four shapes, but ellipses and hyperbolas have a second, even more famous definition, the one behind the classic "pins and string" trick for drawing an ellipse by hand.

Stick two pins in a board. Loop a piece of string around both, longer than the distance between them. Pull it taut with a pencil and trace all the way around. You get a perfect ellipse.

Why does that work? Because the string has a fixed length. As the pencil moves, the sum of its distances to the two pins never changes, it's locked in by the string. That's the actual mathematical definition of an ellipse: the set of points where PF1+PF2PF_1 + PF_2 is constant.

PF1+PF2=2aPF_1 + PF_2 = 2a

Hyperbolas have a mirror-image version. Instead of a fixed sum, it's a fixed difference: PF1PF2=2a|PF_1 - PF_2| = 2a.

Drag P anywhere on the curve. The sum of the two focal distances never changes.

F1F2
PF1192.7
PF267.3
Sum260.0
Constant should be260.0

Drag the point around the curve and watch PF1PF_1 and PF2PF_2 change individually, but their combination, sum for the ellipse, difference for the hyperbola, never budges. Switch modes to see both versions of the trick.


Why satellite dishes are parabolic, not spherical

Here's where this stops being pure geometry and starts explaining real hardware. Satellite dishes, car headlights, flashlight reflectors, and telescope mirrors are almost always shaped like a parabola. Why that curve specifically?

A parabola has a reflection property no other curve has: any ray traveling parallel to its axis, after bouncing off the curve, passes through the exact same point. That point is the focus. Every parallel ray, no matter where it hits, ends up at the same spot.

Press play. Every ray comes in parallel to the axis, hits the parabola at a different spot, yet reflects through the same point: the focus.

focus
Focus (x, y)(38, 0)
Hovered ray hits at x

Press play. Five rays come in side by side, all parallel, all hitting the parabola at different spots and different angles. Watch them anyway converge on the exact same point.

That's why a satellite dish works: incoming signals arrive as (roughly) parallel rays from deep space, and the dish's parabolic curve funnels every single one of them onto the receiver sitting at the focus. Run the same idea backward, put a light bulb at the focus, and every ray leaving it bounces off the dish and exits parallel, which is exactly why headlights and flashlights use the same shape.

Try dragging the focal length pp smaller. Notice the dish gets "deeper" and the focus sits closer to the curve, a tighter beam, more sharply focused. That trade-off is exactly why dish antennas and satellite dishes come in different depths for different jobs.


Putting it together

Four shapes, one origin. Slice a cone at different angles and get a circle, an ellipse, a parabola, or a hyperbola, purely from the angle of the cut. Flatten that idea into 2D, and the same four shapes fall out of a single number, the eccentricity ee, which measures how a point's distance to a focus compares to its distance to a directrix.

Ellipses and hyperbolas carry a second, tactile definition too, a fixed sum or fixed difference of distances to two foci, the same idea behind drawing an ellipse with string and pins. And the parabola's reflection property, every parallel ray bouncing through one single focus, is the reason its shape shows up in dishes, headlights, and telescopes everywhere you look.

One family, one dial, four faces.